The Fear of Hijab (written by a sis)
Nothing strikes fear in the Western psyche like a piece of
cloth on a woman's head
In September 1994, 13-year-old Emilie Ouimet was sent home
from Montreal (Quebec, Canada) s Louis Riel High School because
her Hijab did not conform to the school's dress code.
Two months later, a second Quebec girl, 15-year-old Dania
Baali, was told she would have to transfer to another school from
College Regina Assumpta if she wanted to observe Hijab.
It is incredible to know nothing strikes fear in the hearts of
Western man like a piece of cloth on a woman's head.
The Hijab is Perceived As A Radical Statement
To some, she is making a radical statement about her violent
political ideas.
To others, she is the symbol of absolute subjugation and is in
dire need of rescue.
For them, having such women as part of the North American
landscape is frightening.
She is ?the veiled woman,? belonging in a foreign place, an
actor on an exotic stage.
We are seen as poisoning this free and democratic culture with
our weak and submissive ways.
Thus, various school boards in Quebec have decided that
rooting out the unwanted influence at the earliest point possible
is the best way to avoid contaminating their haute culture.
The Fear of Hijab is Legitimate
I have often wondered why a woman in Hijab participating
freely in this society is perceived as so threatening.
I have always thought that fear of such women was unfounded.
After all, her wearing Hijab has nothing to do with anyone
else-it only has to do with her commitment to Allah. But now I
realize the fear is legitimate.
Muslim women are a threat.
Hijab Sends a Message of Acceptance and Rejection
A woman who covers herself out of the love of Allah is not
just stating something about what she accepts but she is also
saying something about what she rejects.
Any woman who refuses to play the gender games that are so
basic to all societies is going to be pushed out.
Women have always been expected to play some kind of role in
every society.
In North America, a great part of this role revolves around
sex and the aura of sexuality. Any relationship involving men and
women has some kind of sexual undertone.
When a woman covers herself she is rejecting that role, she
is saying sex will have nothing to do with her public life. It is
the fact that she has taken out of the discussion her physical
self that people find so upsetting.
A Woman in Hijab : More than "Just a Woman"
A female doctor, writer, electrician or plumber may be
appreciated in the work environment for her skill, but is still
basically seen as just a woman?
But put her in Hijab so that what makes her a woman cannot be
appraised and all of a sudden you are dealing with a person.
It is a radical idea not liked by many.
She is Rejecting The Politics of Gender
This person is not only rejecting preset gender roles but also
the associated politics of gender.
She is therefore rejecting the basic social structure which
also means she is seen to be rejecting the political system and
its tied economic setup.
So educators in Quebec should feel threatened. Emilie and
Dania are more than just two girls whose headgear does not
conform to school dress code. They are representatives of
something bigger, of a different way of life and of living.
It took me some time to come to this conclusion.
Hijab : An Act of Faith
I had always seen Hijab as a private matter between myself and
Allah.
I chose to wear Hijab because I felt my Iman (faith) had to
be translated into action and if Allah asks me to cover, then I
should.
If I could not act out my faith then what was the point of
saying I had any faith?
But, unfortunately, those around me did not see my wearing
Hijab as a personal act of worship.
Rather, they saw it as a personal attack on them. I wore Hijab
and that automatically meant I disapproved of everything they
did.
I found the hostility difficult to understand. Just because my
head was covered, people were unable to relate to me.
I had a newfound freedom and a greater sense of confidence in
myself as a Muslim but most others saw me as a throwback.
Women's Progress Still Tied To Appreance
Progressiveness for women is unfortunately still defined by
how much they are willing to reveal.
The more power women seem to gain, the more compelled they are
to take off their clothes.
This paradox is at the root of the confusion faced by North
American women.
They are supposed to be strong, independent and assertive
yet, at the same time, they are made slaves to an ideal physical
image which cannot be achieved by the vast majority of women.
This duality is a marketable commodity.
Take the fashion industry for example; the latest from Paris
says: glamor? is the hottest look of the season with its glossy
lipsticks, slip dresses, and spiked heels.
Women object saying that fashion designers are expecting them
to dress like prostitutes at the office.
They loathe the fact that the female body is used for selling
everything from cosmetics to clothing to cars.
Yet when Muslim women cover themselves up and protest the very
same thing, they are conversely regarded as being oppressed.
Terminal Confusion About Women's Freedom
The confusion is terminal. While some fight against what they
see as objectifying women, others feel the ideal way to ultimate
freedom for women is the right to got barechested in public.
The rationale seems to be that once our bodies are
desexualized then it will be safer for us to go out on the
streets.
We just have to give up our dignity, our modesty and our
privacy.
And it is in the midst of all this confusion that women in
Hijab have arrived. Their unwillingness to play into the hands of
either side has earned them scorn.
Hijab has become a Political Statement
Hijab is fundamentally part of worship but, right or wrong, it
has become a political statement as well.
We may only be expressing our commitment to our Deen
(religion) but Hijab is seen to symbolize a rejection of the
West.
The Mistake of the Secularists
This perceived rejection has affected liberal secularists so
profoundly that they are willing to push aside their own basic
principle of individual freedom to stave of the ?oppressive?
influences of Islam.
It would be a wise person indeed who would realize that it is
the very culture secularists are trying to preserve that has led
people to search for something else.
And for those who are truthful to themselves, they will see
that Emilie and Dania have it figured out.