|
(A). At-Tasweer (the act of making images), and
Iqtinaa' as-suwar (the act of possession of
images).
As salaamu alaikum
Anyone who produces a
drawing/graphic of an animal, person, or insect,
i.e. animated living things... will meet a
terrible end on the day of judgement, suffering
hellfires for this action. Secondly, displaying
such graphics in anywhere but a degrading,
disgraceful place (such as those little bears on
baby wipes or something filthy and not on
display, etc.) is also forbidden. The graphic you
mention is of concern and you should not
intentionally use it for any purpose. Here is
daleel (proof) on that:
Hadith - Bukhari 3:428, Narrated
Said bin Abu Al-Hasan
While I was with Ibn 'Abbas a man came and said,
"O father of 'Abbas! My sustenance is from my
manual profession and I make these pictures." Ibn
'Abbas said, "I will tell you only what I heard
from Allah's Apostle . I heard him saying,
'Whoever makes a picture will be punished by
Allah till he puts life in it, and he will never
be able to put life in it.' " Hearing this, that
man heaved a sigh and his face turned pale. Ibn 'Abbas
said to him, "What a pity! If you insist on
making pictures I advise you to make pictures of
trees and any other unanimated objects."
Obliterating and removing images, including from
computer presentations, especially those
involving the deen of Islam, is recommended.
Hadith - Muslim, Narrated Ali ibn
AbuTalib
AbulHayyaj al-Asadi told that Ali ibn AbuTalib
said to him: Should I not send you on the same
mission as Allah's Messenger sent me? Do not
leave an image without obliterating it, or a high
grave without levelling it. This hadith has been
reported by Habib with the same chain of
transmitters and he said: (do not leave) a
picture without obliterating it.
There are, of course, images on the web/net, that
we cannot avoid, like when we send out an email,
and because we're using a free service and
couldn't afford a paid service, the egroup sends
out an advertisement with an image in it, or as
can appear on web pages provided free of service.
Islam says all actions are based upon intentions,
and if you intend to send out no images (people,
animals, insects) then that is your safeguard,
insha'Allah. It is the things that ARE within our
control that we are held accountable for.
May Allah forgive us for our
shortcomings. Ameen.
Regarding the writings of Qaradawi....
There were many good comments in
the article from Qaradawi. However, there was
some error.
He says: "if someone wants to make
a picture of an animate being with no intention
of competing with Allah as creator or for its
glorification or respect, there is no prohibition
of doing so; there are numerous sound ahadith in
this regard."
There is no hadith making this
permissible under any intentions. Notice, he did
not list any either. If you can find such a
thing, "let me know."
Intentions must line up with our
actions, and the only exception is that which is
beyond our control. Picking up a pen is something
we do of our own control. We cannot say we have
no intention to draw a picture and then pick up a
pen and draw a picture.
This may require one to study the
whole understanding of INTENTIONS, in that we get
rewarded/punished based on our intentions in
doing an action. That means we could be ignorant
of a ruling (such as, say you didn't know you
weren't supposed to eat pork and you just became
Muslim), insha'Allah, you are judged by your
intentions to be obedient. But, if ten years
later, your intentions weren't strong enough to
educate yourself on Islam, you may still not be
aware of that ruling (not to eat pork), and then
you are held accountable for not making the
effort to educate yourself. This is where
ignorance is not acceptable, once you have had an
opportunity to know. So, technically, if a person
makes an image and did not KNOW this was haram,
INSHA'ALLAH, Allah swt may not hold that sin
against them, that is the hope, based on the
application of actions are judged by intentions.
If, however, they are shown clear proof, on
ANYTHING, and they still persist when they should
stop... this is clear disobedience as it is a
haram act.
There are many articles of
evidence we could provide to continue to
demonstrate this point. Insha'Allah, we have
included one article by Shaikh al-Albaanee,
in which he writes it as a specific refute to
certain comments made in Al-Qaradaawee's writings
about image-making:
Clarification of Some of the Mistakes of Shaykh
Yusuf Al-Qaradaawee Regarding the Issue of
Image-Making
Excerpts taken from Shaykh
Muhammad Naasiruddeen al-Albaanee's book "Ghaayah
al-Maraam Fi Takhreej Ahaadith al-Halaal
wa'l-Haraam, the chapter on Image-Making, pgs.
76-100.
Abu Hurairah (may Allah be pleased with him)
reported Allah's Messenger (peace and blessings
of Allah be upon him) as saying:
-
Angels do not enter a house [or
any other place] where there are statues (tamaatheel)
or pictures (tasaaweer). [Hadith #6, Chapter
One]
These ahadith and those of similar
meaning which are to follow in the book include
'as-surah al-mujassamah' (three dimensional,
solid images, like statues) as well as 'ghair al-mujassamah'
(two dimensional images, on a plane surface).
Yet the author (Yusuf al-Qaradaawee)
has taken it to apply only to 'al-mujassamah'
(solid images). And this, coming from him, is
strange, since he knows well - I believe - that
the occasion concerning which these ahaadtih
(words) were spoken, and the reason prompting
this matter to be addressed, was in reference to
ghair al-mujassamah (two
dimensional, non-solid images).
This is indicated clearly by the
angel Jibreel's (peace be upon him) being
prevented from entering the house while it had in
it the curtain containing images (surah).
-
[This is in reference to Hadith
#18, Chapter One, containing the words: "...Jibreel
(peace be upon him) asked permission to enter
upon the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah
be upon him). So he (peace and blessings of
Allah be upon him) said: Enter. He (Jibreel)
said: HOW CAN I ENTER WHILE THERE IS A
CURTAIN (SITR) CONTAINING IMAGES (TASAAWEER) IN
YOUR HOUSE?..."]
The other ahaadith also indicate
this, such as the hadith of 'Aa'isha (may Allah
be pleased with her) which follows this one.
POINT #2
Narrated 'Aa'isha (may Allah be
pleased with her):
-
Allah's Messenger (peace and
blessings of Allah be upon him) returned from a
journey when I had placed a curtain of mine
containing images over (the door of) a chamber
of min. When Allah's Messenger (peace and
blessings of Allah be upon him) saw it, he tore
it apart and said: "The people who will receive
the severest punishment on the Day of
Resurrection will be those who try to make
the like of Allah's creation...
In the other narration:
-
...those who make these images [Hadith
#4, Chapter One]
[After mentioning the above hadith
of 'Aa'isha (may Allah be pleased with her), and
pointing to the various narration's as they were
reported by al-Bukhaaree, Muslim, and others --
Shaykh al-Albaanee continues:]
It is known from the circumstances
prompting the speech of the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allah be upon him) on this occasion
[curtain of mine having iamges] that the IMAGES
which were mentioned were ghair al-mujassamah
(not solid images) [they were pictures on a
curtain]. The Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allah be upon him) pointed to this, in his word
"...these images."
For this reason, Qaradaawee's
interpreting it to refer to as-suwar al-mujassamah
(three dimensional, solid images) is very far
from the truth. Wa'llahu'l-Musta'aan! (Allah is
the One we turn to for help)!
POINT #3
Narrated an-Nadr ibn Anas ibn
Maalik, ... that Ibn Abbaas (may Allah be pleased
with him and his father) said:
-
I heard Allah's Messenger (peace
and blessings of Allah be upon him) saying:
"Whoever makes an image in this world would be
compelled to breathe soul (rooh) in it on the
Day of Resurrection, but he will never be able
to do so." [Hadith #15, Chapter One]
This hadith also points out the
fact of (the prohibition) being inclusive of 'ghair
al-mujassam' (i.e. other than three dimensional
solid images). This is because (the hadith) is 'MUTLAQ'
(absolute/generally inclusive of all images,
without conditions or restrictions). Also,
because the narrator of the hadith -Ibn Abbaas
(may Allah be pleased with him and his father)
--did not make it clear that there is any
difference [regarding the prohbition of three
dimensional images which have body, and two
dimensional images which do not].
So, if (the prohbition) was
exclusively limited to al-mujassamah,
i.e. the images which have body (like statues)-
he (Ibn Abbaas) would not have been so strict on
the questioner [in prohibiting all images which
have a soul, without consideration as to whether
it is three dimensional or two dimensional].
Instead, he would have also ruled the
permissibility of ghair al-mujassamah,
i.e. images which don't have a body, even of
those which have souls, as is clear.
Additionally, the understanding of
a companion (sahaabee) is a hujjah
(legal proof), especially if he is the narrator
of the hadith in question. This position is also
supported by the rules of "Usool al-Fiqh," as is
the case here.
It is also supported by the other
texts, as he preceded. For this reason, Imaam an-Nawawee
has decisively declared the incorrectness of the
opinoin of those who make permissible the images
which don't case a shadow (two dimensional), i.e.
those which don't have a body.
POINT #4
From Abu Zur'ah who said:
-
I and Abu Hurairah (may Allah be
pleased with him) entered a house being built
in al-Madeenah for Sa'eed or Marwaan. (Abu
Zur'ah) said: he (Abu Hurairah) saw an
image-maker (musawwir) making images in the
(wall of) the house. He then said: Allah's
Messenger (peace and blessings of Allah be upon
him) said: Allah, the Glorious and Exalted,
said: 'Who is more a wrongdoer than one who
tries to create creation like My creation. Let
him create a small ant (dharrah) or a grain of
wheat.' [Hadith #16, Chapter One. This is the
wording in Saheeh Muslim.]
In this hadith is an evidence, as
in the previous ahaadith, of the prohibition of
image-making of ghair al-mujassamah
(that which has no body) -- by way of
DALAALATI'L-UMOOM, the expression which is
general in its application to everything
which could possibly come under its meaning, all
at one time. [The general expression is the words
one who tries to create CREATION LIKE MY
CREATION]. And that is what the narrator
of this hadith - Abu Hurairah (may Allah be
pleased with him) - understood.
Ibn Battaal said:
"Abu Hurairah (may Allah be pleased with him)
understood that image-making (tasweer) is
inclusive of that which cast a shadow (three
dimensional objects) as well as that which does
not cast a shadow (two dimensional images). For
this reason, he (Abu Hurairah, may Allah be
pleased with him) renounced what was
inscribed/engraved in the walls (of the house)."
POINT #5
Narrated Abu Talha (may Allah be
pleased with him):
-
Allah's Messenger (peace and
blessings of Allah be upon him) said: 'Angels
do not enter a house where there are images (surah).'
Busr [Ibn Sa'eed, who narrated
this hadith from Zaid ibn Khaalid, who narrated
it from Abu Talha] added:
-
Then Zaid fell ill and we paid
him a visit. Behold! There was hanging at his
door, a curtain with an image (surah) on it. I
said to 'Ubaidullah al-Khawlaanee, the
foster-son of Maimoonah (may Allah be pleased
with her), the wife of the Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allah be upon him): 'Didn't Zaid
tell us about images (suwar) the day before
yesterday?' Ubaidullah said, 'Didn't you hear
him saying: except a design in a cloth (illa
raqman fi thawb)?' [Hadith #7, Chapter One]
Narrated 'Ubaidullah ibn
'Abdullah:
-
He entered upon Abu Talha al'-Ansaaree
(may Allah be pleased with him) to visit him,
and he found Sahl ibn Junaif (may Allah be
pleased with him). Abu Talha (may Allah be
pleased with him) ordered someone to remove a
pillow which was under him. Sahl (may Allah be
pleased with him) asked him: Why are you
removing this? He said: It is because it has in
it images (tasaaweer) and you already know what
the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of
Allah be upon him) has said about that. He (Sahl)
said: Didn't he (peace and blessings of Allah
be upon him) say: 'illa raqman fi thawb -
except designs/inscriptions in a cloth?' He
(Abu Talha) answered: Yes, he did say so. But,
(removing it) is more pleasing to my soul. [Hadith
#8, Chapter One]
al-Qaradaawee has quoted this
hadith and the one before it, regarding the
matter of clarification of "the ruling concerning
images (suwar) which are drawn on flat surfaces
such as paper, cloth, curtain... ." He (al-Waradaawee)
then concludes, asking the rhetorical question
[the question already being fixed in the mind of
the questioner]: "Don't these two ahaadith prove
that the figures (suwar) which are prohibited are
those which are solid, that is to say statues?"
I (Shaykh al-Albaanee) say, in
clarification of the reality,: Absolutely not! In
no way do these two ahaadith prove the above. And
in order to explain this, a reminder is necessary
of the fact that we have two issues
in front of us: At-Tasweer (the act
of making images), and Iqtinaa' as-suwar
(the act of possession of images).
The ahaadith which are related to
this topic are divided into two divisions: those
connected to the first issue [the act of
making images], and the other connected to
the second issue [the act of possession of
images]. I have seen that many of those who have
written on the topic of 'tasweer' have had the
two divisions mixed together, and therefore
treated the two divisions as one.
1)
As for those ahaadith related to the first issue
[act of making images] they are all in agreement
about the fact of the prohibition of
tasweer (making images) of both
types, al-mujassam (solid images)
as well as ghair al-mujassam (that
which is on a plane surface).
2)
Some of these ahaadith prove the prohbition by
dalaalah al-umoom (i.e. it points to the general
prohibition of everything included in the meaning
of "surah/image." An example of this is the
previous hadith [Hadith #15] which contains the
words: "whoever makes an IMAGE (surah) in this
world would be compelled to breathe soul (rooh)
in it on the Day of Resurrection, but he will
never be able to do so."
3)
Also, from these ahaadith are those which prove
the prohibition of images by dalaalah al-khusoos
[i.e, it points to the prohibition of a
special/particular type of image, which is
specifically pointed out in the text of the
hadith]. An example of this hadith [#4, Chapter
One] which contains the words: "...the people who
will receive the severest punishment on the Day
of Resurrection will be those who make these
images (alladheena yusawwiroona HADHIHI AS-SUWAR").
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon
him) was pointing to the iamges of the "winged
horses" [Hadith #2, Chapter One] which were on
the curtain which he (peace and blessings of
Allah be upon him) tore up.
4)
As for those ahaadith which are related to the
second issue [possession of images] such
as these two ahaadith [#7 and #8] -- neither of
them indicate the permissibility of making
images, which would be in contradiction to the
indication of the ahaadith of the first division.
5)
Verily, they only indicate the permissibility of
possession (of images). As for the
permissibility of making images - this is
something which the two ahaadith under discussion
do not address at all. So, how could it be
permissible to use them as a proof for that [the
permissibility of making images]? While at
the same time, they would be in contradiction to
the ahaadith of the first division [i.e. those
ahaadith which actually address the issue of the
act of making images, and point to its
prohibition].
6)
The truth of the matter is that the hadith of 'Aa'isha
(may Allah be pleased with her) which has
preceded [#4] addresses both issues: the
prohibition of tasweer (the act of
making images), and the permissibility
of possession of those images which are degraded
- there being some difference of opinion on this
the second point, and this can be reviewed in
Fath al-Baaree and other books for its details.
[See: Introduction (of an-Nawawee) to Chapter
One, and explanation of Hadith #4, Chapter One,
for opinions of Ibn al-'Arabee, az-Zuhree and an-Nawawee,
in this matter.]
7)
This, while the two ahaadith mentioned above have
in common with the hadith of 'Aa'isha [#4] the
fact of their addressing the second issue (possession
of images), while both being silent concerning
the first (the act of making images).
8)
This is what is understood by everyone who
studies the 'dalaalah' (indications/point
addressed) by the ahaadith connected to this
topic -- if he is not influenced by anything
except the desire to attain the truth.
9)
Imaam an-Nawawee has summarized the
speech/sayings [of the scholars] concerning this
topic, in a complete and most excellent
summarization, in his sharh
(explanation) of Saheeh Muslim, saying:
"...IMAGE-MAKING (tasweer) of animate (living)
beings [human and animal] is sternly prohbited
and it is a major sin. This is because the one
who engages in it is threatened with the stern
warning mentioned in the ahaadith. It is the same
whether one makes the image in that which will be
disrespected and degraded or
otherwise - in every case, its making is
prohibited...
As for the possesion/keeping
of that which has in it images of animate beings
[human or animal] -- if it is hanging up on a
wall, or in clothing that is worn, or a turban...
or those things which are not considered to be
degraded or dishonored-- then, it is forbidden.
However, if it is in a carpet
which is trampled upon and treated with
disdain... or those things which are degraded and
disrespected -- it is not forbidden. Yet, there
remains the question of whether or not it
prevents the entry of the angels of mercy to that
house... .
Finally, there is no difference in
any part of this matter [concerning the
prohibition] between that which cast a shadow
[three dimensional, solid objects] and that which
does not [two dimensional pictures, drawings,
etc.]... |